How Washington beats Baylor
Baylor University (9-3) meets the University of Washington (7-5) in the
Valero Alamo Bowl
on December 29.
The Baylor Bears, ranked 12th in the BCS, are
on a five-game winning streak. An unwitting victim of the
unfair, draconian NCAA
sanctions levied against a USC team (10-2), which is bowl ineligible,
the unranked Huskies have won just two of their last six games and are
ill-prepared to take on the likes of a nationally ranked team at this
time, having battled back from a 0-12 season in 2008.
As a result of Troy's ineligibility, all the bowl
eligible teams in the Pac-12 behind Stanford (Fiesta Bowl) and Oregon
(Rose Bowl) are matched against stronger teams than otherwise would be
the case.
Lopsided matchups, like the Alamo Bowl, hurt the national
perception of the Pac-12 Conference and should be of concern to Pac-12
Commissioner Larry Scott and NCAA President Mark Emmert. NCAA
infractions committees aren't playing on the same level field, and Emmert
needs to hammer out the inequities and double standards in sanctions being meted out to member
schools.
The same bias that exists in the NCAA is also
prevalent in the "east coast mafia" (i. e, the east coast
media), the two factions feeding off one another. The television broadcast of the
Alamo Bowl has the promise of being un-BEAR-able to watch for Dawg fans.
So, I'm stuck with trying too make a case for the
Huskies in what appears to be a one-sided affair.
Behind the passing and running of quarterback Robert
Griffin III, the high-scoring Baylor team averages 43.5 points per game.
Griffin (6-foot-2, 220) was the winner of the 2011 Heisman Trophy. He
leads FBS football in passing efficiency with a rating of 192.31,
having thrown for 3,998 yards and 36 touchdowns -- against just 6 picks.
Also, he's rushed for 644 yards and 9 touchdowns. (photo of Griffin
above).
As you would expect, Griffin (also known as RG3) has captured the
hearts
and minds of the east coast media.
RB Terrance Ganaway is averaging 112.25 yards rushing
and leads a running attack that ranks 18th in the nation. The senior
running back has rushed for 1347 yards this season. The Bears rank 2nd
in the FBS in total offense.
The Huskies, ranked 57th in total offense,
are led by Keith Price at quarterback and RB Chris Polk. Price the 2011
winner of Washington's oldest and most prestigious award, the Guy
Flaherty Award, ranks 12th in passing efficiency. Polk, the Dawgs' MVP, is averaging
111.75 rushing yards per game, ranking 16th in that category.
Winning the turnover battle would add life to
Washington's chances. But short of that note that both teams field defenses that are somewhat lacking,
to say the least.
In pass defense and total defense, Washington ranks
116th and 94th in FBS football,
respectively.
Baylor, on the other hand, ranks 114th in total defense: 112th in
pass defense and 102nd in run defense.
The Bears' three losses have all been on the road, games in which
Baylor averaged 29 points per game while giving up an average of 50
points.
Since Waco is three hours away from San Antonio,
the Alamo Bowl is practically a home game for Baylor.
Here's how the Huskies win.
In its 7 wins this season, Washington has held
its opponents to 49.6 yards rushing, while in its 5 losses, UW has given
up 273.9 rushing yards per game. Ironically, the data below suggests
that stopping the run has been UW's most critical defensive statistic
this season, pass defense notwithstanding.
| Washington's Defense |
Rushing yards p/g |
Passing yards p/g |
| Seven winning games |
49.6 |
342.7 |
| Five losing games |
273.8 |
201.2 |
Based on the data above, let's assume Griffin has
a field day passing the ball and Baylor doesn't need to run too much,
accumulating less than 100 yards on the ground. So ...
My pick: Washington 42, Baylor 38
Stewart Mandel (Sports Illustrated) says that
Griffin could have a "Heisman Hangover" by game time and
calls for an upset.
Previous meetings:
The Bears have won three of the four previous
clashes.
Washington beat Baylor 35-14 in the 1964 season, coming off a 3-2 loss
to Air Force. The first time Washington got its hands on the ball,
Steve Bramwell returned a punt 67 yards for a touchdown to set the
Huskies offense in high gear. Showing no ill effects from a knee injury
suffered in the Rose Bowl on January 1st, QB Bill Douglas passed for 94 yards and
rushed for 44. Led by LB
Rick Redman, the Huskies' defense held Baylor to minus-11 yards rushing,
though the Bears passed for 327 yards. Lawrence Elkins, the Bears'
All-American flanker-back, caught one pass, a 65-yard TD throw, and on
the ensuing kickoff was ejected from the game for punching a Washington
player.
Note that the Huskies used the same formula for
winning in 1964 as we're suggesting for the 2011 Alamo Bowl, being
outgained 316 to 283 yards.
The Huskies' trick play: Washington took a
delay-of-game penalty that allowed it to change
platoons. That is, on a fourth down punt situation, the Huskies took a
delay penalty to avoid taking a precious timeout to send in the right
platoon.
After the game, Baylor coach John Bridgers said, "They (the officials)
let the clock run for 25 seconds, then call the delay penalty. The other
platoon comes in and the clock is running. It should not start until the
ball is snapped.
"This way in a tight game, Washington could run out the last two minutes
without making a play. I've never seen it done before."
Bridgers had high praise for UW fullback Junior Coffey, and also for
Redman, Bramwell, and Douglas.
Comparative Statistics
Out of the 26 statistical measures shown in Table 1 below, Baylor wins 15 of them,
with 1 tied.
Table 1. Comparative Statistics in 2011
In columns 3 and 5, the first number represents the
team's rank in the
conference, while the second number represents the team's rank in FBS football
(out of 120 teams).
1. Ball Control
|
Time of Poss. |
27:36 |
9 |
29:41 |
8 |
|
3rd-down conversions |
44.9 |
5 |
44.9% |
4 |
|
4th-down conversions |
69.6 |
2 |
50% |
T-5 |
|
First downs |
344 |
1 |
248 |
8 |
2. Blocking and Tackling
|
Rushing Offense |
215.1 |
2, 18 |
152.0 |
6, 67 |
|
Passing Offense |
356.2 |
3, 5 |
240.3 |
8, 51 |
|
Rushing Defense |
198.7 |
8, 102 |
142.6 |
6, 54 |
|
Passing Defense |
278.8 |
9, 112 |
283.8 |
11, 116 |
|
Pass Eff Defense |
141.2 |
8, 95 |
136.1 |
6, 79 |
|
Pass Eff Offense |
194.0 |
1, 1 |
153.3 |
4, 17 |
|
Total Offense |
571.2 |
1, 2 |
392.3 |
9, 57 |
|
Total Defense |
477.5 |
8, 114 |
426.3 |
10, 94 |
|
Sacks |
19 |
T-6, 85 |
24 |
T-8, 56 |
|
Sacks Allowed |
25 |
7, 70 |
34 |
11, 102 |
3. Mistakes
|
Penalties |
65.1 |
9 |
63.2 |
6 |
|
Opponent Penalties |
64.0 |
2 |
55.2 |
10 |
|
Turnover Margin |
.33,+4 |
3, 32 |
.17,+2 |
6, 42 |
4. Field Position
|
Kickoff Returns |
19.2 |
10, 105 |
23.7 |
3, 27 |
|
Punt Returns |
8.6 |
6, 56 |
7.4 |
7, 74 |
|
Punting net/punt |
33.0 |
10, 114 |
39.7 |
3, 11 |
|
Kickoff coverage |
43.7 |
5 |
41.0 |
10 |
5. Scoreboard, Baby
|
Field Goals |
.562 |
9 |
.733 |
5 |
|
Redzone Offense |
75.9 |
8 |
88.9 |
T-2 |
|
Redzone Defense |
83.3 |
5 |
89.3 |
9 |
|
Points For |
43.5 |
2, 6 |
31.5 |
5, 36 |
|
Points Against |
35.7 |
8, 109 |
33.3 |
10, 99 |