Tree topples Troy: a Yankees kind of thing
Statistics restore some sanity
Richard Linde, 8 October 2007
Everyone
remembers the story about the man who drowned in a stream that
had an average depth of six inches. Then there is the other statistical
bromide that says: "Torture numbers, and they will
confess to anything."
Does that mean statistics in college football are worthless? Well,
sometimes they are helpful; in the case of the Tree's 24-23 victory over
Troy, the notion of a limited football season, 12 or 13 games played, restores some sanity to
the process of putting the game in its proper prospective.
In other words, these things happen, and over a much longer football
season, we would expect upsets such as this to occur. They would be the
norm, not the exception. College football's elite would all suffer
multiple losses over a longer football season -- alas, and to some of
the weakest opponents. You might not stub your toe every time you climb into bed, but sometime,
over the course of days, weeks or years, you will.
Playing a limited schedule means that too much
emphasis is placed on the occurrence of what seems to be a major upset
in college football.
Also, a look at the raw data on the season suggested beforehand that the
Tree/Troy
game would be closer than the
bookies' 40-point spread.
But raw data aren't the whole answer to the upset, as
we well know. At times, statistics
that predict victories surrender to human emotions and fate.
Enthusiasm, emotion, discipline and focus are
unmeasured variables that can be used to explain Stanford's upset of USC. Add your own
reasons here -- like overconfidence on the part of Troy, maybe an
injury here or there, being out-coached, and so on.
Playing a limited schedule is a "Yankees kind of thing."
Sportswriters and fans tend to get carried away with
upsets in football, failing to put them in their proper perspective.
No one would think anything of the New York Yankees, a perennial major
league powerhouse, getting off to a
6-6 start on the season and being beaten by the worst teams in the
league. Or even if the Yanks should lose 6-straight games somewhere in
mid-season.
College football doesn't play enough games in a
season to diminish the value of an upset. Upsets factor too heavily in the
rankings; the paucity of games in college football is another good
reason to have a playoff system for determining a national champion. But
is that even enough?
According to physicists at the Los Alamos National
Laboratory in order to guarantee that the best team in baseball
actually wins the World Series teams would need to play 256 games per
team, well beyond the 162 games each Major League Baseball team
currently plays in the regular season.
"According to the physicists' analysis and
simulations of league play, there is always at least some chance that a
lesser team can prevail in any given game." [networkworld.com].
The Tree's humbling of Troy is one good reason to
be looking at raw statistics though. The stat involving Turnover Margin
has haunted the Trojans over their last few games. Going into the
Washington game, the one before Stanford, USC ranked 85th in the country. They ended up
minus-1 on the game with
Washington, a 27-24 win, and minus-4 on the game with Stanford. Currently,
the Trojans rank 106th in the country in Turnover Margin, having turned
the ball over 14 times while pulling off just 7 thefts themselves. They also rank last
in the conference in incurring penalties. In their last two games the
Trojans have lost 241 yards to the zebras.
On a personal level, I feel that the lack of
mobility at the quarterback position has come home to roost for the
Trojans, and is their most glaring weakness, along with injuries on the
offensive line that have affected the running game.
Are the surging Cardinal going to win the
conference this season? Nope, its not in the cards. The men from the
farm have the worst stats in the league. But that doesn't mean Stanford can't pull off another upset, a Yankees kind of thing.
According to our 11-stat comparator (see the table
below), four teams are clearly
positioned at the top of the Pacific-10 conference: Arizona State, USC, Oregon, and
California.
According to these same stats, UCLA and Oregon
State are clearly in the middle of the conference. Oregon State leads
the country in rushing defense and is second in the country in sacks,
this in a conference that isn't supposed to play defense.
Separated by one and one half points, WSU, Arizona
and Washington are the penultimate three teams, with Stanford
definitively at the
bottom.
In our 11-stat comparator, Washington has an
average national ranking of 65.6, out of 119 Division I-A teams,
Arizona State, the Huskies next opponent, has an average national
ranking of 30.3, a number that has been skewed upwards by sacks allowed.
Looking at the PEO/PED/RD stats, I would guess that UW quarterback Jake
Locker might have another bad night throwing the ball and that RB Louis
Rankin is going to have a tough time running the ball.
Although ASU has played a soft schedule, it did
beat Colorado which beat then number-three-ranked Oklahoma. But
then again you could say that upset was a Yankees kind of
thing. You know, this stuff happens, a quirk of fate determined by other
variables not statically minded.
Strength of schedule is another factor not weighed
by statistics, especially with respect to comparing teams from different
conferences. In the table below, both LSU and Ohio State rank
considerably better than any team in the Pac-10. They rank 1 and 3,
respectively, in the AP poll, while Cal is number 2. However, if we
massage the Trojans' statistics and enter a 23 for Turnover Margin,
which is their average ranking for their other 10 statistics, their
overall average ranking changes to 23, which correlates with LSU's and
tOSU's statistical ranking.
Turning Turnover Margin into a positive number is
the Trojans' most pressing need.
In our Boise State preview, we noted that the
Broncos had an average national ranking of 14.1 compared with
Washington's 77.1, these numbers based on our 11-stat comparator for the
2006 season. We
suggested that the figures needed some sort of Pac-10/WAC
normalization, considering the Broncos 2-8 record against Pac-10 teams?
UW ended up beating Boise State 24-10.
According to my
Directv guide, the UW/ASU game will be broadcast by by Comcast SportsNet
(channel 640). Last week, Comcast provided television coverage for the
WSU/ASU game in high definition, a game that I watched on my HD TV. I am
assuming that the UW game on Saturday will be broadcast in HD on channel
640. If you don't have the proper hardware, channel 640 won't even
appear on your Directv channel guide. You will need the big dish to
catch the birds, a B-Band converter, along with an MPEG-4 set top box,
an HD20 DVR, for example.
Table. 11-stat comparator.
The following statistics give the national ranking
number for each team in the conference as it compares with the 119 teams
in NCAA Division I-A football. For example Washington ranks 93rd in the
nation out of 119 teams in Total Offense.
RO=Rushing Offense, RD=Rushing Defense, PEO=Pass
Efficiency Offense, PED=Pass Efficiency Defense, SO=Scoring Offense,
SD=Scoring Defense, SF=Sacks For, SA=Sacks allowed, and TM=Turnover
Margin.
|
Team |
TO |
TD |
RO |
RD |
PEO |
PED |
SO |
SD |
SF |
SA |
TM |
Avg |
|
ASU |
41 |
20 |
56 |
9 |
10 |
9 |
21 |
7 |
25 |
112 |
24 |
30.3 |
|
USC |
19 |
10 |
18 |
7 |
45 |
11 |
20 |
30 |
46 |
33 |
106 |
31.4 |
|
UO |
6 |
80 |
4 |
64 |
7 |
37 |
6 |
46 |
46 |
48 |
37 |
34.6 |
|
Cal |
38 |
70 |
25 |
39 |
50 |
63 |
13 |
53 |
32 |
5 |
3 |
35.6 |
|
UCLA |
55 |
32 |
37 |
10 |
94 |
41 |
57 |
50 |
18 |
96 |
101 |
53.7 |
|
OSU |
57 |
13 |
62 |
1 |
109 |
71 |
61 |
57 |
2 |
51 |
109 |
53.9 |
|
WSU |
40 |
92 |
93 |
60 |
36 |
116 |
61 |
103 |
34 |
38 |
41 |
64.1 |
|
UA |
63 |
61 |
111 |
33 |
49 |
59 |
54 |
68 |
55 |
85 |
80 |
65.3 |
|
UW |
93 |
83 |
53 |
86 |
104 |
46 |
59 |
59 |
46 |
34 |
58 |
65.6 |
|
SU |
83 |
105 |
97 |
81 |
93 |
112 |
92 |
98 |
15 |
114 |
46 |
85.1 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSU |
34 |
1 |
12 |
4 |
34 |
1 |
16 |
2 |
13 |
79 |
4 |
18.2 |
|
tOSU |
47 |
2 |
19 |
2 |
14 |
3 |
32 |
1 |
30 |
10 |
65 |
20.5 |