Recruiting thoughts
Malamute, 7 December 2006
Scout.com says that the current UW
recruiting class is ranked thirty-fourth in the nation, with an
average star ranking of 2.69.
Does that mean that Coach Willingham gets a B-minus from the
department of recruiting thus far?
Or does it mean that Tyrone has a better handle on recruiting
sleepers than do the other 118 coaches in Division IA football?
Put in perspective, UW is losing 26 seniors, mostly out of its 2002 and
2003 classes, classes that scout.com ranked twenty-third and eighteenth
in the nation respectively. Washington's 2004, 2005 and 2006 classes were ranked
twenty-second, fifty-fifth, and thirty-fifth. Two four-star recruits out
of the 2004 class never played a down -- Matt Tuiasosopo and Keauntea
Bankhead – their loss certainly worsening its relative high ranking if
computed again.
These facts champion the notion that UW certainly had talent last
season ... but not enough. The rankings explain the 5-7 record and those close
games it lost when it ran out of gas. Support for the two deeps was
missing for the most part. Support for the starters on the OL, which, as
a unit, wore down in October, turned into vaporware.
On paper, considering the mediocre recruiting that has taken place in
recent years and the tough schedule next season, the coach and UW appear
to be in deep yogurt. (See the Table below).
Willingham has three years left on his contract. I doubt if it will be
extended after next season's play, which means he'll have just two years
to go.
All we need is another coaching carousel at UW.
Adage: Not recruiting playmakers means you'll end up with prayer-makers,
as in Hail Mary.
I hope I’m putting too much credence on
rankings, but I keep thinking of the nation’s elite and how they recruit
each year, e.g., Notre Dame, Ohio State, Michigan, USC. They all bring
in top-ten-to-top-twenty classes annually. Are their classes just artifacts of
their success on the gridiron and not germane to being a football
powerhouse, with coaching, conditioning, motivation and, perhaps, a weak
schedule being the prime ingredients? A good percentage of five-star
recruits end up playing on Sunday, though.
Someone told me that 2-3 star running backs out of Washington State were
under-rated compared to those from
California.
As far as that goes, the names DeShaun
Foster and Paul Arnold, who were both available to Rick Neuheisel when
he came to UW in December 1999, come to mind. Dawgman posters told me
that Arnold was better than Foster back then.. I know that Paul had a congenital
back defect, but still he was no Foster before his back acted up.
And who was that disgruntled UW athlete
from California who talked to Danny Robbins and Elliott Almond?
Anyway, he said that “Washington wouldn't be s*** without its California
players.” See “Bitter Roses.”
As far as Donald Bulter goes, every team
has a Donald Butler, a kid who flew under the radar.
If I had my druthers, UW would stick with
“Ty Willie,” as he is affectionately called, for the next 10 years.
Playing golf as well as he does makes him a better recruiter, in my
mind. Enjoy it
coach, for it won't last forever, not that I had any links savvy to
last me.
(Editor's note. The above was
written before Tyrone's recent recruiting spurt; I think Mal
has softened a bit).
Tyrone’s recent finds, Kalani Aldrich (3
stars) and Brandon Johnson (4 stars), have silenced my critique. I have hope for this class
finishing in the top twenty, not that that will save next season, but it
would put the program back on track.
Does Danny Te’o -Nesheim
bear a likeness (a facial resemblance) to Herman Wedemeyer (left, Saint
Mary’s; Hawaii Five-O's Duke Lukela)? (Te'o-Nesheim pictured above).
It’s nice to see the Hawaiian pipeline flowing, which reminds me of an
old Hawaiian recruiting adage, one that rumor says is written on a
placard that hangs in Mike Bellotti’s office.
“Wailea today when you can Kaanapali to
Maui.”
Which means:
Why lie today when you can con a
Polynesian tomorrow. ;-)
Is that why Aldrich chose UW over Whoregon? ;-)
Table. UW recruiting over the past 6 years (Data
taken from scout.com).
| Year |
Division IA Rank |
| 2002 |
23 |
| 2003 |
18 |
| 2004 |
22 |
| 2005 |
55 |
| 2006 |
35 |
| 2007 |
34 |