4malamute.com

Articles
    Archives
    Season 2000
    Season 2001
    Season 2002
    History Articles
    Spoofs
    Editorials
Dawg Food
    Schedule
    Links Page
    Statistics
Site Development
    About This Site
   
Cast
     Contact Us


                      

Bell's theorem: a non-local win?
How the 'Cats and Dawgs stat up
By: Richard Linde, Posted 1 November 2004

Both the Washington Huskies (1-7) and the visiting Arizona Wildcats (1-7) will be looking for a win this Saturday, as both teams try to repair badly broken seasons. Reconnoitering after a string of losses, both teams need to face reality and square up with some woeful stats.

They share last and next-to-last rankings, one team or the other, in a number of conference measures.

Can particles be in more than one universe at a time?

Considering RB Mike Bell’s performance against the Huskies last season, stopping him might be as unlikely as a reincarnated Einstein putting a hit on Bell’s theorem, which states that reality must be non-local. So, is Mike Bell faster than the speed of light -- living proof of Bell’s theorem?

Last year, Bell rushed 26 times for 222 yards, including touchdown runs of 67, 69, and 37 yards, as the Mild-brats upset the Huskies, 27-22, snapping a 13-game conference home losing streak.

Bell, fourth in the conference in rushing (averaging 80.8 yards per game), must be salivating at the thought of facing the Huskies again. Previously, this year, UCLA’s Maurice Drew ran for a school record 5 touchdowns and 322 yards against the Huskies. Stanford’s J. R. Lemon rushed 19 times for 162 yards, scoring 3 touchdowns, one of them coming on a 58-yard gallop.

Lemon’s and Drew’s performances partially explain why the Huskies are fourth in the league in red zone defense, which can be an elusive statistic.

The UW can counter with  linebackers Joe Lobendahn and Scott White, who rank second and fourth in the league in tackles, respectively. Also, DE Manase Hopoi tops the Pac10 in both sacks and tackles for a loss.

The UW outplayed Oregon for most of the second half last week. QB Casey Paus settled into a rhythm -- as much as could be hoped for -- connecting with new-found weapon Craig Chambers on some nice passes. The second-half drives Paus put together rested a defense that held Oregon to 5 straight 3-and-outs. However, Paus' 4 interceptions on the game proved costly.

Of the 20 statistical categories shown in the Table below, Arizona bests the Dawgs in 10 of 19 categories, with one even. The 'Cats have an average conference rating of 7.2 to the Huskies' 7.55, where smallest is best.

In that Table, the Huskies' turnover margin (-14), rushing defense (184.5 yards per game) and time-of-possession (27:44) are the most significant categories with which the Dawgs must improve on.

"Will the Dawgs and 'Cats settle their tiff amicably?" Alice asked the March hare.

The Bottom Line:

Although Washington leads the conference in Pass Defense, its lofty ranking is offset by its pass-efficiency defense, which ranks eighth. The team that runs the ball best and commits the fewest turnovers should win the game. Their second half performance against Oregon gives the Huskies a glimmer of hope. Can Huskies coach Keith Gilbertson, who got his walking papers Monday, rally his troops for a spirited effort? We think the Huskies will bounce back and win one for the Gilber, Bell's theorem and non-locality notwithstanding.

Our Prediction: U-Dub 27, 'Cats 24
Las Vegas odds: Washington by 1 1/2
Our Record: 8-0, on the year
Forecast: Partly cloudy, 55 degrees

Table 1. How they stand in the Pac-10

Category UW Pac UA Pac
1.  Ball Control        
Time of Possession 27:44 9th  30:26 6th
2. Blocking/Tackling        
Rushing Offense 133.4 5th 122.0 6th
Passing Offense 174.6 9th 162.2 10th
Rushing Defense 184.5 9th 119.6 4th
Passing Defense 183.1 1st 228.8 10th
Pass Efficiency Defense 121.1 8th 139.4 10th
Pass Efficiency Offense 76.4 10th 104.4 9th
Total Offense 308.0 9th 284.2 10th
Total Defense 367.6 8th 348.4 5th
3. Mistakes        
Penalties 58.9 6th 45.4 4th
Turnover Margin -14 10th -2 7th
4. Field Position        
Kickoff Returns 19.0 6th 18.3 8th
Punt Returns 5.1 10th 8.8 6th
Punting (Net Per Punt) 36.0 6th 34.1 8th
Kickoff Coverage 19.9 5th 16.1 1st
5. Scoreboard, baby        
Field Goals 50% T7 50% T7
Red Zone Offense 59.1% 10th 63.2% 9th
Red Zone Defense 72.4% 4th 78.8% 8th
Points For 13.0 9th 12.2 10th
Points Against 30.1 10th 23.2 6th
         
Average Rank in Pac-10  

7.55

 

7.2

 

 

Original content related to this site,
including editorials, photos
and exclusive materials
© 4malamute.com, 2001
All Rights Reserved