No Bunk, it looks dead evenDawgs may need Bunk Play
against Ducks
By:
Richard Linde, Posted 30 October 2003

This week, according to
rumor, the ghost of Gil Dobie paid Oregon coach Mike Bellotti a nocturnal
visit, reminding him of the Bunk Play he devised in 1911 to score a touchdown
against Oregon by courtesy of the old
“there-she-is-there-she-ain’t” gimmick. The UW won the game, 29-3.
As for the Bunk Play, imagine 11 Ducks chasing a "Sun Dodger" who
has a helmet tucked under his arm--that is, QB Wee Coyle and his leather
thingamajig. Meanwhile the center, Presley, laterals the real thingamajig to end Wayne Sutton, and he romps in for a
TD. After the play, there is some excessive celebratin' goin' on.
Allegedly, Bellotti told Dobie that "we’ll be dancin' on
your 'dubya'” on Saturday night, which was in reference to the Dawgs’ excessive
celebration at Autzen Stadium that occurred after their 42-14 victory over
Oregon last season, to the block “W” painted mid-field at Husky Stadium, and to
the Bunk Play.
Rumors aside and for real on
Saturday, the Huskies (4-4) and Ducks (5-3) resume their rivalry, which began in
1900. The Huskies lead the series 57-33-5 and have an average score against
Oregon of 17-12.
During the first quarter of last year's game, before the
rain began, Oregon jumped off to a 14-point lead, using a a variety of
Bunk-like plays to confound the Dawgs. After the rain began in the second
quarter, Oregon was forced to shelve its legerdemain and play some real Dobie-like football against the Huskies. The Dawgs owned them from then on,
holding the Ducks to just 133 total yards for the rest of the game.
Pickett’s short drops and quick release worked to
perfection under the rainy conditions, whereas, Jason Fife, out of Lake Elsinor,
seemed to lose his rhythm and touch. "We didn't handle the weather well," coach
Mike Bellotti said after the game.
The weather forecast this Saturday is for 47 degrees
(daytime high) and partly cloudy conditions.
In the statistical categories
listed below, both teams tie at 10 categories apiece. The Ducks have an
averaging ranking of 5.45 in the Pac-10 compared to Washington's ranking of
5.5, where least is best. Statistically, the two teams are pathetically even. The Dawgs are a 1 1/2 point favorite.
RW Reggie Williams of Washington
ranks tenth in the country in pass receptions, averaging 7.25 catches per game.
CB Derrick Johnson, ranked 17th in the nation in interceptions, is averaging.
.5 interceptions per game.
With WR Charles Frederick and RB Rich Alexis sitting out
the game because of injuries, the Huskies’ half-dimensional offense, when
compared with last year’s one-dimensional offense, has been cut again in half,
so it would seem.
That means one of the Dawgs’ freshman wide receivers must
come into his own on Saturday night to disperse the fan club that will surround
Reggie Williams on almost every play.
Or perhaps, TB Kenny James will have an outstanding
performance. But one running back can’t do it alone nowadays unless he’s a
Steven Jackson; it takes a stable of running backs to batter the opposition.
Shelton Sampson needs to prove he can hang onto the ball, a dicey situation for
Coach Gilbertson. Last Saturday, USC showed how easy it is to win a football
game with its running game--a thundering herd of running backs consisting of
Reggie Bush, Hershel Dennis, Chauncey Washington and LenDale White. The Trojans
could have won the game against the UW on the ground alone, its passing attack
adding cosmetics to a formidable offense.
Collegio Football says that
Oregon should be a 72% favorite to win the game; it ranks the UW sixth in the
conference and Oregon fourth. In comparing common opponents, Oregon beat Nevada
31-23 and Stanford 35-0, while Washington lost to Nevada 28-17 and beat the
Tree 28-17. The UW has won 3 of its last 8 games against Oregon.
Ted Miller of the P-I picks the
Ducks, 31-24.
Because the Huskies' stats were
skewed negatively by the hammering they took from USC last Saturday, we're
picking the Dawgs, 35-32. The Ducks don't play USC this season.
Telecast: TBS, 7:00 PM, PST
Table 1. How they stand in the Pac-10
| Category |
UW |
Pac |
UO |
Pac |
| 1. Ball Control |
|
|
|
|
| Time of Possession |
30:55 |
4th |
30:58 |
3rd |
| 2. Blocking/Tackling |
|
|
|
|
| Rushing Offense |
120.0 |
6th |
151.0 |
2nd |
| Passing Offense |
278.6 |
4th |
266.8 |
6th |
| Rushing Defense |
121.0 |
7th |
85.2 |
3rd |
| Passing Defense |
237.4 |
5th |
281.6 |
10th |
| Pass Efficiency Defense |
124.3 |
7th |
125.3 |
8th |
| Pass Efficiency Offense |
122.1 |
5th |
132.5 |
3rd |
| Total Offense |
398.6 |
5th |
417.8 |
3rd |
| Total Defense |
358.4 |
5th |
366.9 |
6th |
| 3. Mistakes |
|
|
|
|
| Penalties |
69.6 |
4th |
74.2 |
6th |
| Turnover Margin |
-.62 |
T8th |
-.5 |
7th |
| 4. Field Position |
|
|
|
|
| Kickoff Returns |
19.0 |
8th |
21.0 |
5th |
| Punt Returns |
13.0 |
1st |
10.6 |
3rd |
| Punting (Net Per Punt) |
37.8 |
4th |
35.1 |
10th |
| Kickoff Coverage |
19.0 |
4th |
21.8 |
10th |
| 5. Scoreboard, baby |
|
|
|
|
| Field Goals |
64.3% |
5th |
60% |
7th |
| Red Zone Offense |
72.7% |
T7th |
81.5% |
2nd |
| Red Zone Defense |
84% |
8th |
73.1% |
3rd |
| Points For |
26.8 |
6th |
28.8 |
4th |
| Points Against |
25.8 |
T7th |
28.1 |
8th |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Average Rank in Pac-10 |
|
5.5 |
|
5.45 |