Who Killed Washington?
Ten leading suspects By: Malamute, 13 October 2003
Although
I have no persuasive idea of what’s wrong with the Washington
Huskies, I do know they were one of the pre-season favorites in the hunt for the
Roses--but after six games, roses are withering on the Husky vine and fans are
jumping off the bandwagon.
Last Saturday was called separation Saturday in college
football because the contenders were separated from the pretenders. Verdict:
Washington is a pretender.
So, who killed Udub football? I’ve conducted my
investigation, listed the suspects and have turned my case over to the jury:
myself.
1. Suspect: Keith Gilbertson:
The evidence:
Count
1. Husky coaches yell vociferously at players during practices.
This tactic might work for a while, but it becomes old hat, turning paradoxical
over time. Finally, the players just quit after falling behind, believing they
are a bunch of blundering dunderheads. UW players apparently quit in the second
halves in both of the UCLA and Nevada games.
Count 2. The Huskies have concentrated too much
effort on run blocking while neglecting pass blocking, so say the eight sacks
against QB
Cody Pickett on Saturday.
Count 3. Not being prepared for Nevada’s highly regarded DE
Jorge Cordova was inexcusable in light of what happened against UCLA the week
before, when DE Dave Ball and DT Rodney Leisle turned the game around, combining
on a touchdown of their own making to start the second half. Against the Dawgs,
Cordova posted 16 tackles (11 solo, 5 assisted) and was credited with 5 sacks (4
solo, 1 assisted) for 26 yards.
Count 4. The Huskies scouted Nevada poorly, as evidenced by
poor execution on defense in their 28-17 loss.
Witness: Sportswriter Glenn Dickey. “Keith Gilbertson is
not head coaching material.”
Defense: Mr. Gilbertson
says the Huskies have turned the ball over during the month of October for three
years in a row now. So, by implication, turnovers happened under Coach Neuheisel's
watch, as well. Mr. Gilbertson blames the UW's poor redzone offense, in part, on
too many starts from the 10-yard line.
Verdict: Mr. Gilbertson is guilty of counts of 3 and 4, to
wit: poor game-day preparation and poor scouting. I, the jury, find him innocent
of counts 1 and 2. The players respect Gilby, while his focus on run blocking
was sorely needed.
Sentence: He is hereby sentenced to
three years of listening to The Husky Honk Show and to reading Glenn
Dickey’s and Art Thiel's next columns.
2. Suspect: the fans
Evidence: On internet message boards, Husky fans routinely
bash certain players, the comments of which get back to the players. One
player’s girlfriend prints out posts concerning the player--the good, along with
the bad--and the player reads all of them.
Curiously, certain Husky dinosaurs, left over from the Don
James era, bash other Husky fans for not yelling continuously during each home
game, especially when the team is on defense.
Verdict: The fans are innocent; they’re only a
symptom of the problem. Those internet posters who write disparaging remarks are
guilty of hurting player morale.
Sentence: Derogating posters are sentenced to a
singing of the Oregon fight song.
Opinion: Husky fans are sophisticated. They
recognize a bad team when they see one. Half naked, purple-painted clods making horses’ petards
out of themselves won’t get the job done as they cheer on older, sophisticated
fans—so Husky Stadium remains eerily quiet on Saturday afternoons, quieter
than it would be otherwise.
3. Suspects: Don Coryell, Sid Gillman and Bill Walsh (The
West Coast Offense)
Evidence: Because of its short-passing game, which
features run after catch, the UW has a hard time coming from behind. Six yards
and a cloud of rubber make it difficult to play catch up football, especially
when you’re catching and not running or dropping and not catching.
The WCO might mask a lot of deficiencies left over from
poor recruiting years, but it quickly crumbles when facing a dominating defense.
Verdict: All three men are guilty as charged; Mr. Walsh is
sentenced to a reading of his book, “Building
a Champion: On Football and the Making of the 49ers.” Mr. Coryell will lecture
the Tyee club, discussing his glory playing days at Washington--with an emphasis
on glory--while Mr. Gillman will
lecture the higher authority, the one in the sky, about throwing a football.
4. Suspect: Art Thiel:
Evidence: At the local level, one internet website (MADDD)
provides links to over 100 articles that are inimical to the University of
Washington football program, all of the articles written by local sportswriters
over the last two years. By my count, many more stories are missing from the
database. Art Thiel—the ESPN Playmakers scriptwriter incarnate—barks out marching
orders to fellow hit men who follow dutifully in lockstep.
Verdict: Mr. Thiel is guilty as charged and will be given a
run-on sentence with no period to rest, a sentence that requires a kick in the
split infinitive, a knee to the dangling participle, a chop to the passive-voice
box, a boiling in a mixed metaphor, a poke in the squinters, and someone to wipe
the simile off his face.
J
Opinion: Former coach Rick Neuheisel never had a chance to
display his recruiting skills at the UW. Periodic sanctions restricted his
recruiting effort, and a hostile local media, smitten with the idea that
big-time college football is corrupt, chased prospects away from a program that
was paying Neuheisel a big-time-college football wage.
5. Suspect: Barbara Hedges
Evidence:
Some say that athletic director Barbara Hedges has destroyed the football
program by focusing too much attention on Title IX sports. She hired Rick Neuheisel,
knowing fully well he wore the appellation Slick Rick,
carried over
from his days as head coach at Colorado.
Defense: Because of Neuheisel's participation in a
bidding pool, Ms. Hedges says everyone in the country knows her age and her hair color.
Verdict: Innocent, by reason of insanity. Hair color and
age have nothing to do with the Huskies' plight.
Opinion: Bashing Hedges and Neuheisel make for an
easy copout. The buck stops with the current head coach, his staff and no one
else. Otherwise, there is no accountability, nor will there be any
accountability for the next three years.
6. Suspect: Rick Neuheisel
Evidence:
Count 1. Nueheisel left the cupboard bare for Keith
Gilbertson.
Count 2. Neuheisel's never-ending problems with the NCAA,
which restricted his recruiting efforts because of sanctions levied against him
and his coaching staff, hampered his recruiting at Washington.
Defense: All of Neuheisel's recruiting classes
were rated among the top 20, during his four years at Washington. One of his
classes (2001) was ranked number 4 by Allen Wallace of Superprep Magazine. This
season, the Huskies were one of the
favorites to win the conference championship.
Verdict:
Count 1. Innocent because of Mr. Wallace's deposition.
Count 2. Guilty as charged. Who knows how well Neuheisel
would have recruited if he'd been playing with an un-stacked deck?
Sentence: Mr. Neuheisel is to apply for a job with
the San Francisco 49ers.
Opinion: However, the buck stops with Keith Gilbertson, who also had
his hand in the recruitment of players. First and foremost, Mr. Gilbertson must
make the best of the hand he has been dealt.
The
loss of four wide receivers from last season’s team (Paul Arnold, Pat Reddick,
Will Hooks, Jr., and Eddie Jackson) has turned last season’s one-dimensional
offense into a half-dimensional offense. In its last two losses, the UW’s
running game has gone south in the last half, while its passing game has
sputtered.
The Huskies are desperately short
of offensive linemen because of player attrition and injuries.
7. Suspect: Cody Pickett
Evidence:
Witness: Sportswriter Ted Miller.
Although Pickett is completing 60 percent of his passes, like last
season, he's tossed seven interceptions, including six in the past two games,
and has fumbled five times.
“Pickett
is the biggest reason why the Huskies rank last in the Pac-10 in turnover margin
(minus-7) and red-zone offense. He deserves a lion's share of the blame, just
like he received so much credit for his spectacular numbers a year ago, while
his team languished in mediocrity.”
Verdict: Innocent, by reason of an old cliché: A
quarterback is given too much credit for winning and too much blame for losing.
Opinion: The accumulation of eight sacks during
Saturday’s game gradually destroyed Mr. Pickett’s rhythm, the loss of which
could have been affected by
previous injuries and the cold, damp day. Because of the heat he took, the wet
ground sizzled each time he hit the deck.
9. Suspect: Tank Johnson.
Evidence:
During the UCLA game, right on television, Terry Johnson and Reggie Williams’
gratuitous outbursts on the sidelines made the other players look bad, the
effect of which lowered their morale. Some say they were just mimicking
their coaches, who yell at them during practices.
Defense: At the Olympia training camp, Mr. Johnson
complimented my sports shoes, which were designed for Ken Griffey, Jr.
Verdict: Innocent. His taste in sports shoes is impeccable.
10. Suspect: Parity
Evidence: Washington’s football program appears moribund,
but in the age of parity in college football anything can happen.
Verdict: Guilty. Of all the suspects, parity in
college football is the most likely culprit.
Opinion: It’s possible, but unlikely, for the
Huskies to turn the season around because of an offense that appears prone to
turnovers (106th in NCAA turnover margin). Lack of depth on the offensive line
contributes to this ongoing problem, along with the fact the Dawgs must rely too
much on WRs Reggie Williams and Charles Frederick. Blocked field-goal tries,
four so far this season, will continue to haunt the Dawgs. Pickett's
understandable reluctance to run the ball weakens Washington's offense even
more.
Richard Linde (a.k.a., Malamute) can be reached at
malamute@4malamute.com
|