Huskies improved stats in 2002
Significant statistical gains made over 2001By:
Malamute,
Posted 10 January 2003

Although the Dawgs finished 7-6
this season compared with the prior season's 8-4
finish, they improved in 14 of 20 statistical categories, a 70% improvement. With
16 of 22 position players returning in 2003, the Huskies should be one of the
dominating teams in the Pac-10 next season--providing they continue to improve
on these numbers. Kenny James, pictured to the left, should add some Mojo to a
rushing attack, which dropped off in 2002.
Of the five major categories shown below (see Table 1),
the Huskies made improvements in four of the five. In field position, the
Huskies suffered a major drop off from the preceding year, for example, in
kickoff returns and punt returns.
Of the 20 statistical categories shown in Table 1, the Huskies improved in
total offense, total defense, rushing defense, scoring (both offense and defense),
pass efficiency (both offense and defense), and several other categories.
The Huskies' rushing defense made a significant improvement,
allowing just 97.7 yards per game, compared to 162.6 yards per game the year
before. In the 2000 championship season, the Huskies allowed 141.2 yards per
game, finishing sixth in the conference. During the 1999 season, the Dawgs
allowed an average of 140.7 rushing yards per game.
In 2002, the Huskies were penalized less than they were in 2001 and
improved on their
turnover margin.
The 2002 rushing offense fell off from the preceding year, falling from
111.7 yards per game to 74.5 yards per game . This can be attributed to the
departure of Willie Hurst, who, in 2001, netted 607 total yards on the ground in 10
games, while averaging 4.4 yards per carry. In the same season, Rich Alexis rushed for 391
yards, averaging 3.1 yards per carry, and both combined for a rushing
average of 96.2 yards per game. This season, Rich Alexis netted 688
yards rushing, averaging 3.4 yards per carry, but there was no one behind him
to contribute in a significant way.
Not having a capable replacement for Willie Hurst in 2002 can be blamed on
the coaching staff, along with Hurst's relegation to slot receiver in the
spring of 2000, which nibbled away at the morale of the team.
Call me the “undertaker,” Hurst said. “You may try to bury me, but I'll keep
coming back.” And he did, winning the
"Guy Flattery Most Inspirational"
award for 2001.
With the offensive line returning mostly intact for next season and with
senior tailback Rich Alexis returning, along with running backs Kenny James, Chris
Singleton and Shelton Sampson, the Huskies' running game looks to improve just
enough to keep opposing defenses honest.
The Huskies led the conference in 3rd down conversions (43.5%) this season,
after finishing 4th (38.2%) in the conference in 2001. They also led the
conference in passing offense, first downs, and penalties-against this season.
Individually, quarterback Cody Pickett led the conference in total offense.
Pickett, along with a cadre of talented receivers, promise an air war for
next season that has the fire power of the Tenth Air Force combined with the
range of a B2 bomber. Well, almost.
Table 1. The Huskies' statistics in 2002 compared with 2001 (the 2002
statistics for the conference include the bowl games, while the 2001 statistics
do not). Improvements are highlighted in purple.
| Category |
2002 |
Pac |
2001 |
Pac |
| 1. BALL CONTROL |
|
|
|
|
| Time of Possession |
32:25 |
2nd |
30:53 |
3rd |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 2. BLOCKING/TACKLING |
|
|
|
|
| Rushing Offense |
74.5 |
9th |
111.7 |
9th |
| Passing Offense |
346.2 |
1st |
279.5 |
2nd |
| Rushing Defense |
97.7 |
4th |
162.6 |
10th |
| Passing Defense |
259.5 |
8th |
220.0 |
4th |
| Pass Efficiency Defense |
129.2 |
6th |
135.2 |
8th |
| Pass Efficiency Offense |
131.2 |
7th |
125.9 |
7th |
| Total Offense |
420.7 |
3rd |
391.2 |
6th |
| Total Defense |
357.2 |
4th |
382.6 |
5th |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 3. MISTAKES |
|
|
|
|
| Penalties |
52.8 |
1st |
69.7 |
8th |
| Turnover Margin (all games) |
+1 |
7th |
-3 |
6th |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 4. FIELD POSITION |
|
|
|
|
| Kickoff Returns |
18.6 |
7th |
23.6 |
3rd |
| Punt Returns |
7.4 |
9th |
14.1 |
3rd |
| Punting (Net Per Punt) |
34.3 |
7th |
33.4 |
8th |
| Kickoff Coverage |
22.4 |
8th |
20.4 |
3rd |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 5. SCOREBOARD, BABY |
|
|
|
|
| Field Goals |
.647 |
8th |
.636 |
8th |
| Red Zone Offense |
80.4% |
5th |
71.2% |
10th |
| Red Zone Defense |
82.6% |
9th |
72.5% |
3rd |
| Points For |
30.6 |
7th |
28.2 |
7th |
| Points Against |
26.3 |
6th |
29.4 |
7th |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Average Finish in the Pac-10 |
|
5.9 |
|
6.0 |