Running back Rich Alexis. Photo by Kim Grinolds, dawgman.com |
It’s not often that the
Ducks and Huskies have anything in common. However, in three offensive
categories, this year’s conference champion, Oregon, and last year’s
Rose Bowl Champion, Washington, shared some offensive statistics that
are benchmarks for teams in the Pac-10 this upcoming season. |
Last season (2001), the Huskies finished sixth in the
Pac-10 in total offense. Although the Dawgs were second in passing offense,
they finished tenth in rushing offense, tenth in red zone offense and seventh in
scoring offense in the Pac-10.
The season before (2000) in the Pac-10, the Rose Bowl
champion Huskies finished first in
rushing offense, eighth in passing offense, first in red-zone offense and second
in scoring offense.
Likewise, this season, conference-champion Oregon was third in scoring offense,
eighth in passing offense, second in rushing offense and first in red-zone
offense. The Ducks (2001) and the Huskies (2000) were certainly likeminded.
(See Table 1).
Table 1. How Oregon and Washington have finished in the
Pac-10 in four offensive categories.
| Team |
Scoring |
Rushing |
Red Zone |
Passing |
| UO 2001 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
8 |
| UW 2000 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
| UW 2001 |
7 |
10 |
10 |
2 |
These statistics say, that to put more points on
the board this upcoming season, the Huskies will need to develop a better
running attack, so it will have a better red-zone offense. In other words, a
balanced attack is necessary for putting points on the board inside the red
zone. Running the ball effectively gets even more critical the closer a team
gets to the end zone.
Oregon
cashed in 95% of the time on their red-zone opportunities (37-39), running for
20 touchdowns, passing for 14 touchdowns, while kicking 3 out of 4 field goals.
The Huskies failed to score 15 times when inside the red zone last season
(37-52). Inside the red zone, the Dawgs missed 6 field goals and were
intercepted 4 times (tops in the conference); obviously these two statistics
need improvement.
The
Huskies have a multidimensional quarterback, Cody Pickett, who can operate in
the limited field the red zone presents. He can throw short, precise routes or
leg it in if he has to. The other ingredient needed is a running attack.
After
the spring game last week, offensive coordinator Keith Gilbertson grumbled
about the blocking of the offensive line, and coach Rick Neuheisel said,
"Our running game has got to come around. We need a running back to take
over, to be a dominant player."
During
the spring game, which featured a clash between the Ones (Purples) and Twos
(Whites), each defense effectively stopped the other's running game; the Purples
were limited to 59 yards on the ground and the Whites to –2 yards. In part, these poor
statistics were due to the fact that once the quarterback was touched, he was
considered down on the play. And
sack (13 sacks in the game) losses count against the rushing statistics. During
the game, rushing-wise, Chris Singleton ran 13 times for 37 yards and a touchdown, Rich Alexis
was 4 for 27 yards, with a 13-yard run called back, and Braxton Cleman was 7
for 18 yards and two
touchdowns. They were the leading rushers.
All in all, though, the Husky running game sputtered in the spring
game, and its lackluster showing is highlighted by the fact that the Dawgs
finished last in the Pac-10 in rushing defense last season.
If
Washington is to be a dominant factor in the Pac-10 race this upcoming season, it will need a strong
running game to maintain ball control and keep the pressure off a questionable
defense--questionable at this time because of injuries that kept a number of
players from participating in the spring game and because of its so-so
performance last year. Not to mention that a strong running game
will make the Dawgs more productive in red-zone offense, giving their opponents a
two-dimensional look to worry about.
Until
the Huskies battle Michigan in August, we really won't know where the Dawgs'
rushing offense is at. Most likely, the running attack is a year away
from gelling, considering the young linemen and questionable tailbacks. Of the
two deeps on the offensive line, there are four sophomores, two red-shirt freshman, three
juniors and one senior. Running
back Rich Alexis must show he can hit the hole with authority and oft-inured
Braxton Cleman must stay healthy if the Dawgs are to have any success running
the ball.
Over the
past ten years in the Rose Bowl game matching the Pac-10 and Big Ten, the team that has run the best has won.
Table 2. Offensive Statistics over the Last
Two Seasons (Washington Huskies versus the Pac-10).
| Offensive Statistic |
2000 |
2001 |
| Passing Offense |
8 |
2 |
| Rushing Offense |
1 |
9 |
| Total Offense |
4 |
6 |
| Scoring Offense |
2 |
7 |
| Redzone Offense |
1 |
10 |
| Pass Efficiency Off. |
8 |
7 |
| Turnover Margin |
8 |
6 |
| Fourth Down Conversions |
6 |
2 |
| Third Down Conversions |
2 |
4 |
| Time of Possession |
2 |
3 |
| Sacks Against |
3 |
4 |
| Average |
4.1 |
6.1 |