Inside the red zone, Part II
A look at the
2001 Husky defense inside the red zone
By: Malamute, 10 May 2002
DT Terry Johnson. Photo courtesy of dawgman.com |
You could say that the Huskies’ defense bent but
didn’t break last season. After all, in the conference, they finished third
in red-zone defense. Seemingly, when it came to giving the opposition a chance
to cash in their chips, they were as stingy as most Las Vegas Casinos.
|
Sure the Dawgs allowed their Pac-10 bedfellows some
romping room between the twenties, but when it came to giving them a chance to
mine some pay dirt, they stopped them 73% of the time. That’s the good news.
The bad news is that the Dawgs gave up more touchdowns
(29) in the red zone than any other conference member. That was because Husky
opponents were inside the red zone 51 times during the season—the most in the
league.
Finishing last in rushing defense, the Huskies gave up the
most rushing touchdowns (16) and were tied for allowing the most passing
touchdowns (13) in the red zone.
The Huskies finished seventh in scoring defense, allowing
29.4 points per game. That doesn’t include Texas’s 47 points against them
in the Holiday Bowl, when the Huskies surrendered 27 points in the fourth
quarter to blow a 19 point lead. The Dawgs gave up four red-zone touchdowns in
the last quarter of that game.
However, it was more than just a red-zone problem in that
game; the Huskies’ defense gave up 592 total yards. If those were pieces of
gold, and Silas Marner and Ebenezer Scrooge were managing their estate,
they’d declare bankruptcy.
Actually, the Huskies aren’t in the business of
establishing a trust fund for their Pac-10 cohorts. They’d like for them to
go into Chapter 11.
In so doing, a better defense against the run next season
would help. More sacks, too. The Dawgs “D” was eighth in sacks, garnering
only 20 for the whole season.
But it wasn't just a defensive problem for the Huskies.
The Huskies were routed three times last season, all in
games played on the road. Each game had a similar beginning, with Husky
turnovers leading to easy touchdowns for the bad guys.
That's a no-no for a young team playing on the road.
In the UCLA game (35-13), Taylor Barton fumbled while
being sacked, and the Bruins turned it into a quick touchdown, taking 6 plays
to go 32 yards. After a long drive, which made it 14-0, the Bruins’ Marcus
Reese blocked a Derek McLaughlin punt and Jybril Raymo recovered the ball on
the six-yard line and ran it in for a touchdown with 2:08 left in the first
quarter. UCLA was up 21-0 and never headed.
In the OSU game (49-24), down 21-10, the Dawgs worked their way from their
own 20 to the Beavers' 14-yard line. Then
Cody Pickett threw a 73-yard interception return to Dennis Weathersby that
turned a seemingly “close game” around. After Steven Jackson's one-yard
run, the Huskies were down by 18 points (28-10). It was a fourteen-point swing.
The Miami (65-7) blowout happened because of turnovers and
mistakes more than because of a shoddy defense. Table 1 illustrates that point.
The 'Canes took a 37-0 lead into halftime.
Table 1. It wasn't all a defensive problem in 2001
|
Offensive turnovers in Miami game |
'Canes/UW |
| Started from Dawgs' 13 after an interception |
7-0 |
| Started from Dawgs' 41 after a 31-yard punt |
14-0 |
| Started from Dawgs' 38 after an interception |
21-0 |
| Punter McLaughlin tackled for a safety |
23-0 |
| Ensuing kick run back to Husky 15-yard line |
30-0 |
| Interception run back for a touchdown |
37-0 |
That's not to say that the Huskies won't need a better red-zone defense in
2002. However, a less-generous offense will give the defense a better chance to
show its true mettle, especially in the red zone.