Washington Husky Statistics 2001, How the Huskies stacked up in the Pac-10

Home

Articles
    Archives
    Season 2000
    Season 2001
    History Articles
    Spoofs
    Editorials
Dawg Food
    Schedule
    Links Page
    Statistics
Site Development
    About This Site

Link to 2011 Stats

Link to 2010 Stats

Link to 2009 Stats

Link to 2008 Stats

Link to 2007 Stats

Link to 2006 Stats

Link to 2005 Stats

The following stats are for each of 4 seasons (2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004). The 2005 and 2006 seasons are linked above.

How the Huskies Rank in the Pac-10, 13 Jan 2005
National figure in bold. (all games)

1. BALL CONTROL

Time of Possession: 28:26 (7th)

2. BLOCKING AND TACKLING

Rushing Offense: 120.2 (6th) (90th)
Passing Offense: 190.8 (9th) (77th)
Rushing Defense: 183.6 (9th) (83rd)
Passing Defense: 185.8 (1st) (17th)
Pass Efficiency Defense: 123.8 (8th) (61st)
Pass Efficiency Offense: 78.7 (10th) (117th)
Total Offense: 311.0 (9th) (103rd)
Total Defense: 369.5 (7th) (55th)

3. MISTAKES

Penalties: 56.8 (6th, 70th)
Turnover Margin: 42, -19 (10th) (116th, last)

4. FIELD POSITION

Kickoff Returns: 18.7 (8th) (88th)
Punt Returns: 5.3 (10th) (111th)
Punting (Net Per Punt): 36.5 (4th) (58th)
Kickoff Coverage: 20.8 (7th, 69th)

5. SCOREBOARD BABY:

Field Goals: 58.8% (7th)
Redzone Offense: 61.8% (10th)
Redzone Defense: 73.0 (3rd)
Points For: 14.0 (10th) (117th)
Points Against: 30.4 (10th) (83rd)
-------------
How the Huskies Rank in the Pac-10, 9 Jan 2004
National figure in bold

1. BALL CONTROL

Time of Possession: 31:16 (3rd)

2. BLOCKING AND TACKLING

Rushing Offense: 119.5 (6th) (92nd)
Passing Offense: 269.7 (5th) (80th)
Rushing Defense: 151.6 (9th) (83rd)
Passing Defense: 233.4 (4th)
Pass Efficiency Defense: 121.8 (6th) (63rd)
Pass Efficiency Offense: 117.5 (7th)
Total Offense: 389.2 (5th) (104th)
Total Defense: 385.0 (7th) (58th)

3. MISTAKES

Penalties: 62.3 (3rd)
Turnover Margin: 26, 30, -4, -.33 (7th) (116th)

4. FIELD POSITION

Kickoff Returns: 18.3 (8th) (88th)
Punt Returns: 10.9 (1st) (110th)
Punting (Net Per Punt): 38.6 (4th) (46th)
Kickoff Coverage: 17.4 (2nd)

5. SCOREBOARD BABY:

Field Goals: 58.8% (7th)
Redzone Offense: 70.8% (7th)
Redzone Defense: 85.0% (9th)
Points For: 26.0 (6th) (116th)
Points Against: 26.3 (6th) (85th)

How the Huskies Rank in the Pac-10, 3 Dec 2002
National figure in bold, as of Dec 9 2002

1. BALL CONTROL

Time of Possession: 32:59 (2nd)

2. BLOCKING AND TACKLING

Rushing Offense: 77.0 (9th) (113th)
Passing Offense: 352.4 (1st) (4th)
Rushing Defense: 96.1 (4th) (10th)
Passing Defense: 257.5 (8th)
Pass Efficiency Defense: 127.3 (6th) (70th)
Pass Efficiency Offense: 134.4 (5th)
Total Offense: 429.4 (3rd) (16th)
Total Defense: 353.6 (4th) (47th)

3. MISTAKES

Penalties: 53.5 (1st)
Turnover Margin: +2 (6th) (51st)

4. FIELD POSITION

Kickoff Returns: 19.4 (6th) (79th)
Punt Returns: 6.7 (9th) (103rd)
Punting (Net Per Punt): 34.4 (7th) (71st)
Kickoff Coverage: 21.9 (7th)

5. SCOREBOARD BABY:

Field Goals: 70% (T 5th)
Redzone Offense: 81.1% (5th)
Redzone Defense: 82.5% (9th)
Points For: 31.2 (7th) (33rd)
Points Against: 25.7 (4th) (57th)

How the Huskies Ranked in the Pac-10, 3 Dec 2001

1. BALL CONTROL

Time of Possession: 30:53 (3rd)

2. BLOCKING AND TACKLING

Rushing Offense: 111.7 (9th)
Passing Offense: 279.5 (2nd)
Rushing Defense: 162.6 (10th)
Passing Defense: 220.0 (4th)
Total Offense: 391.6 (6th)
Total Defense: 382.6 (5th)

3. MISTAKES

Penalties: 69.7 (8th)
Turnover Margin: -.27 per game (5th).

4. FIELD POSITION

Kickoff Returns: 23.6 (3rd)
Punt Returns: 14.1 (3rd)
Punting (net per punt): 33.4 (8th)
Kickoff Coverage: 20.4 (3rd)

5. SCOREBOARD, BABY

Washington: 28.2 points (7th)
Opponents: 29.4 points (7th)